Различия

Показаны различия между двумя версиями страницы.

--- hops:dry_hopping_wizard [2015/01/08 10:18] – cocademon
+++ hops:dry_hopping_wizard [2015/01/08 10:22] (текущий) – cocademon
@@ Строка 1: / Строка 1: @@
-====== Сухое охмеление: Волшебник ======
+====== Сухое охмеление: Г-н Волшебник ======
 Автор:  Эштон Льюис(Ashton Lewis)\\
 [[http://byo.com/stories/issue/item/1954-dry-hopping-mr-wizard|Оригинал: статья BYO за Март/Апрель 2009]]
@@ Строка 5: / Строка 5: @@
 **Волшебник развеивает страхи сухого охмеления.**
 **Сухое охмеление**
@@ Строка 12: / Строка 13: @@
 There are few practices in brewing that transform beer as much as dry-hopping and I think every homebrewer who loves the aroma of fresh hops should try dry hopping. The great thing about dry hopping is that all of the stories you cite about it are totally bogus. Specifically, you can add hops whenever you want to your beer and there is NO risk of spoiling your beer with microorganisms from hops.
+{{ :hops:wizard.jpg|}}
 Most brewers do dry hop after fermentation is complete because the carbon dioxide produced during fermentation does strip hop volatiles and reduces the impact of the hops added. Dry hopping during fermentation can also plug up your airlock. That’s a bad thing, so dry hopping after fermentation is complete is practical and that’s why it is usually done at the end. As far as what vessel the hops are added to I beg to differ with those who make a big deal about it needing to be done in a secondary fermenter.